This is a hidden column

getTagNameMorningstarCorporate:blog/bigpicture

What the Evolving 529 Market Means for College-Savings Planning

With most plans in the 529 market making improvements, plans that stay stagnant are falling behind

Madeline Hume, Morningstar Research Services

 

The 529 industry has consistently improved since we began covering the market in 2004: Fees have fallen, underlying investment quality has increased, and oversight has strengthened.  

Morningstar Research Services’ annual study, “529 College-Savings Plan Landscape,” showcases the market’s most recent improvements and leverages our latest methodology for analyzing and rating plans. Here are a few of this year’s key findings.  

1. Total assets in the 529 market remained mostly unchanged 

Assets under management in the 529 market remained virtually unchanged year over year from 2017 to 2018—the first time they haven’t posted meaningful growth since 2011. This was largely due to fourth-quarter 2018 losses, which dragged down the S&P 500’s calendar-year return to -4.4%.  

However, as shown on the chart below, 529 plans still saw strong growth over the three- and five-year periods ending December 2018, with annualized rates of 7.9% and 7.4%, respectively. Lower-cost direct-sold plans saw greater growth than higher-cost advisor-sold plans over the past five years: 9.9% compared to 4.4% annually. In addition to higher inflows, lower expense ratios helped direct-sold plans grow faster, since they lose fewer assets to fees.  

Industry Total Assets Under Management By Distribution Channel (USD Millions)

2. Fees continue to decline for both direct- and advisor-sold plans  

The average advisor-sold portfolio came with a 0.93% fee in 2018, a 0.06% drop from 2017. This is compared to an average fee of 0.39% for direct-sold age-based portfolios—a cheaper fee overall, but with a 0.03% drop from 2017, falling at a slower pace than advisor-sold plans (shown on the chart below).  

As a result of this environment, plans that aren’t cutting fees look less attractive than peers. For instance, in 2018, we downgraded the Morningstar Analyst Ratings for Arkansas’ and North Dakota’s direct-sold plans to Negative from Neutral, as their fees have become increasingly high relative to peers that have aggressively cut expenses. 

Average Total Expense Ration of Age-Based Tracks, 2016-2018

3. The quality of investments underlying 529 plans has improved 

The underlying investments included in a 529 plan’s portfolio play a meaningful role in helping families reach their college-savings goals.  

As the chart below shows, the average percentage of assets in age-based portfolios that reside in Morningstar Medalists has about doubled over the past three years, from just over 30% in 2015 to nearly 65% at year-end 2018. This trend toward higher-quality investments in 529 plans highlights the need for plan providers to continually review and upgrade their lineups to remain competitive. 

Average Percentage in Medalists of 529 Age-Based Portfolios, 2015-2018

4. In the 529 market, many plans have implemented smoother transitions from stocks to bonds in age-based portfolios  

Age-based portfolios are a popular choice for 529 plans because they automatically move out of stocks and into bonds as a child grows up, which helps families accumulate savings for college while tapering volatility. 

Age-based portfolios follow either static or progressive (commonly referred to as stepped or smoothed) approaches as they rebalance along the age-based track. The former makes abrupt shifts from stocks to bonds at predetermined dates by shifting assets from one investment option to another, often every few years and timed based on the beneficiary’s date of birth. This static approach can introduce meaningful market risk if it makes a large asset-allocation change suddenly. Meanwhile, a progressive track keeps the investor’s assets in a single investment option—similar to a target-date retirement fund—and uses smaller, more frequent asset allocation adjustments, making for a smoother ride.  

In recent years, plans have narrowed the size of the steps their age-based tracks take, so investors take more frequent but smaller jumps. As shown on the chart below, which groups 529 plans’ age-based tracks into one of three buckets based on the track’s largest equity percentage point step down in the glide path, more than 40% of age-based tracks (including progressive glide paths) step-down their equity exposure in increments of 10 percentage points or fewer. This is compared with 10% two years ago.  

Previous editions of Morningstar’s 529 landscape report have shown that historically, smaller and more frequent transitions have tended to lead to better outcomes. It can be prudent to smooth out an age-based track because a smoother track works to reduce the variability in outcomes while improving, or at least not affecting, an investor’s average return.  

Percentage of Age-Based Portfolio Tracks by Greatest Equity Step, 2016-2018

5. The federal tax benefits of 529 plans now extend to private primary and secondary education, though these are not universally matched at the state level  

In recent years, federal policymakers have increased the flexibility of the 529 plan as a spending vehicle to extend federal tax savings on education. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of late 2017 legislated that expenses qualifying for 529 savings now include tuition for private K-12 education. 

However, states aren’t uniformly embracing this greater latitude. Examples of various state situations include: 

  • Missouri has automatically conformed to this federal legislation. 
  • Colorado introduced a bill to expand tax benefits to K-12 savers but failed to pass the legislation. 
  • New York is seeking to expand these tax benefits, but legislation is currently tabled. 
  • Massachusetts has created laws that exclude K-12 savers from local tax benefits.  

For the most part, 529 plan providers are still determining what investment options they will offer to meet K-12 withdrawals. As of December 2018, most states that permit K-12 deductions have not yet adapted their investment lineups for this group of savers. 

With lower fees, better-quality investments, and improved age-based portfolio designs, the 529 market has become increasingly competitive. Our ratings reflect which plans have been the most successful at keeping pace with the trends that our research indicates are driving the industry.  

For more about the landscape of 529 plans, download our white paper.

Get My Copy

The information, data, analyses and opinions presented herein do not constitute investment advice; are provided solely for informational purposes and therefore are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. The opinions expressed are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice. Except as otherwise required by law, Morningstar shall not be responsible for any trading decisions, damages or other losses resulting from, or related to, the information, data, analyses or opinions or their use. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of Morningstar and may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, or used in any manner, without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Investment research is produced and issued by subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc. including, but not limited to, Morningstar Research Services LLC, registered with and governed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 

The Morningstar Retirement Quiz for Advisors

Test your knowledge and get ideas for helping your clients.

Trending Research

Get our latest in-depth analysis and differentiated industry coverage.

Our HSA Rankings

Read how we evaluated 11 of the largest health savings account providers.