Skip to Content
The Short Answer

What is a Stock Split?

Companies like to play with the price of their stocks. Here’s why and what you should know.

Mentioned: , , , , , , , ,

Recently, both Apple (AAPL) and Tesla (TSLA) announced stock splits. Apple announced a 4-for-1 split, while Tesla announced a 5-for-1 split. What does that mean?

Just Math
Simply put, a stock split is exactly what it sounds like. One share gets divided, or split, into multiple shares. Don’t worry, though. The value of your holdings is the same, just in smaller chunks.

Think about it like a dark chocolate bar. Your one big dark chocolate bar is broken down into multiple bite-size pieces. You still have the same amount of chocolate, just in smaller segments.

Similarly, in a stock split, it is very important to remember that the price of the share also is reduced. For example, if a company board announces a 2-for-1 split, then you get one extra share for each share you own--but the share price will be halved. In this example of a 2-for-1 split, if you had one share of Company X at $10 per share, you now have two shares of Company X at $5 per share.

This does not mean that the stock has become cheaper. The fundamentals of the company and the stock price have not changed. Sticking with the dark chocolate bar analogy, after breaking the bar into smaller bits, you have smaller bits of dark chocolate, not more chocolate overall.

Is This New?
For Apple, not really.

This will be the fifth time the stock is splitting. The first time the company announced a stock split was in 1987; that was a 2-for-1 split. It also announced 2-for-1 splits in 2000 and 2005. The last stock split was a whopping 7-for-1 split in June 2014.

For Tesla, yes, this is the first time the company has split its stock.

But Why?
Why do companies announce stock splits?

Stock splits are a way for companies to increase their overall liquidity.

Liquidity means the ease with which investors can buy or sell shares on a stock exchange. The smaller the dollar amount of each share, the smaller number of shares are needed by even the smallest investor to buy or sell that stock.

In most cases, stock splits are undertaken by companies when the share price has gone up significantly, particularly in relation to a company’s stock market peers. If the share price becomes more affordable for smaller investors, it can reasonably be assumed that more investors will participate, and so the overall liquidity of the stock would increase as well.

But remember this with stock splits: Though the number of outstanding shares changes, and though the price of each share changes, the company's overall market capitalization stays the same. The value of the company doesn’t increase when a split occurs, therefore the value of your stocks, your shares, doesn’t change, either.

Take Tesla for example. Before the stock split, Tesla shares traded at around $1,500 per share. Many people might not have been able to invest in Tesla because they did not have $1,500 to invest in one share in the company. (True story for me!) After the 5-for-1 split, the stock price will drop to around $300 per share, which is a lot more manageable for many more investors.

This is especially true now with more and more investors having access to low-cost trading platforms. Buying and selling stocks is now easier than ever, and for many investors these recent splits might be an entry point into companies they have long admired.

All this being said, these recent high-profile splits seem superfluous given that most brokerage platforms now enable trading in fractional shares. Perhaps the psychology of owning at least one whole share is at play in the companies’ decisions.

But additional participation by smaller investors could also lead to the price increasing, which we saw in the prices of both Apple and Tesla immediately after the stock split announcement.

“When we look at a company like Apple and strictly observe the value of an investment immediately after a stock split, there really isn’t a discernable pattern in the change in wealth. What is noticeable is the trading volume of the stock which might be attributed to news flow. All this said, for long-term investors in a stock, a stock split (or reverse split) really doesn’t affect the fundamental value of the company or the wealth in your pocket,” points out Morningstar Canada’s Director of Investment Research Ian Tam.

Here’s what happened to Apple after each of its splits:

Source: Morningstar Direct, data as of Aug. 10.

Does the Company Change?
Not at all. Stock splits do not alter the fundamentals of the company in any way, apart from the short-term price increases we described earlier. There’s no harm done in this regard if the stock doesn’t split either.

Tesla and Apple were not even the highest-priced stocks in the market. That distinction goes to Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), which is trading at around a whopping $318,000 per share. Another stock with a high price is the Swiss maker of Lindt chocolate, Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli, which trades at over CHF 7,500 per share (over $8,000) on the London Stock Exchange.

Among the FAANG stocks, of which Apple is a part, Amazon (AMZN) is the highest priced, at $3,200. The others are Alphabet (GOOG) at $1,500 per share; Netflix (NFLX) at $480 per share; and the lowest priced is Facebook (FB) at $260 per share.

The Upside Down
The opposite of a stock split is a reverse stock split.

In the case of reverse stock splits, the company divides the number of shares that investors own, rather than multiplying them. As a result, the price of the shares increases.

For instance, if you own 10 shares of Company X at $10 per share, and the company announces a 1-for-2 reverse stock split, you end up owning five shares of Company X at $20 per share. Usually, reverse stock splits are announced by companies that have low share prices and want to increase them--oftentimes to avoid being delisted. 

You may think that reverse stock splits are bad news for the company, but this is not always the case. One of the most famous examples of reverse stock splits is Citigroup (C). Its share price declined to under $10 during the 2008 global financial crisis and stayed there, so in 2011 the Citigroup board decided to do a reverse split of 1-for-10. The split took the price from $4.50 per share to $45 per share. The company--and the stock--survived and is now trading at around $52 per share.

More recently, with the collapse of oil prices, we saw the large United States Oil Fund (USO) do an 8-to-1 reverse split when it fell to around $2 per share. Holders of eight shares before the split would have been looking for their one share to be $16 on the other end. They’re now around $30 each. See, just math!

Ruth Saldanha does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.