Pain Continues for Wells Fargo in Q2
The pain continued for Wells Fargo in the second quarter, as the bank reported a net loss of $2.4 billion, or $0.66 per share.
The pain continued for Wells Fargo (WFC) in the second quarter with a net loss of $2.4 billion, or $0.66 per share. The bank barely eked out a profit in the first quarter and was unable to do so in the second. On the surface, the main driver was again provisioning, with the bank recording provisioning expense more than double that of the first quarter. This was arguably above what anyone expected. Peers generally saw an increase in provisioning expense of roughly 12%-25% compared with the first quarter, far below what Wells recorded. The bank also cut its dividend, as expected. We previously thought the bank would cut the dividend but wouldn’t be forced to cut to $0, and Wells did announce a cut to its quarterly dividend from $0.51 to $0.10. However, while management implied that it doesn't think it will have to cut the dividend further, we warn investors that this is not a given; we now think there is a material chance the dividend could be cut to $0. It will largely depend on how much Wells has to record in provisioning expense in the third and fourth quarters.
Smaller capital markets and trading operations and an inability to grow the balance sheet due are hurting results for Wells. While expected limited balance sheet growth, Wells’ net interest margins are deteriorating more than we originally anticipated. If there were any positives, it is that the bank’s common equity Tier 1 ratio is holding up well, increasing to 10.9% in the second quarter, and the bank hasn’t destroyed massive amounts of tangible book value per share, down only 5% year over year. After updating our projections for the latest results, we lower our fair value estimate to $46 from $50. This is partially due to updated rate assumptions, which took $1 off our valuation, but the largest factor was our incorporation of a 50% chance that Joe Biden is elected president and his proposed tax plan is implemented, which would raise the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%.
|Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.|
Eric Compton does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.