These Wide-Moat Stocks May Be Worth Paying More For
Several cases can be made for buying what seem to be fairly valued high-quality stocks.
Sometimes, you get what you pay for. The $50-plus sirloin at Gibson's Steakhouse will certainly taste better than the $17 one from Chili's. Bose headphones for $300 provide a better sound experience than the pair you can pick up at Five Below. And yes, there are cheaper alternatives, but nothing gets clothes as white as Clorox bleach (at least in my opinion). If you prize quality, be prepared to pay up for it.
To some extent, the same can be said in investing: Paying up for high-quality companies--those wide-moat stocks with solid competitive advantages that should be able to generate greater returns on invested capital for two decades or more--is often worth it.
Susan Dziubinski does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.