Tyson Purchase Sound but Low Impact
Buying Keystone Foods gives no-moat Tyson international growth potential, but it won't significantly change the firm's ability to generate economic returns.
No-moat Tyson's (TSN) $2.2 billion cash purchase of Keystone Foods from Marfrig Global Foods should not alter our $67 fair value estimate much. While we think the deal creates international growth potential, we do not anticipate it will meaningfully change our low-single-digit top-line growth and high-single-digit adjusted operating margin expectations for the next decade. We believe Tyson's shares trade fairly.
Valued at about 10 times trailing adjusted EBITDA (8 times including synergies), the deal should boost Tyson's international standing, as 35% of the target's $2.5 billion in revenue (in total, about 6% of Tyson's estimated fiscal 2018 take) comes from non-U.S. markets. Keystone has plants in China, Thailand, Australia, Malaysia, and South Korea serving a portfolio that caters mostly to food-service clients and will add to Tyson's relationships with global restaurant chains, in our view. The purchased assets, which focus on prepared chicken products, should help Tyson diversify its sales mix globally; about 12% of fiscal 2017 sales came from international markets. While the deal raises key customer concentration--Keystone is a major chicken nugget supplier for McDonald's--we anticipate the combination will offer new opportunities to sell a broader range of Tyson's offerings to such large accounts while creating avenues for Keystone to leverage Tyson's client roster.
Still, we do not expect the deal to much change Tyson's ability to generate economic returns. Keystone produces value-added products, but such items are still hard to differentiate, limiting pricing power. While it's certainly not egregious, we see the multiple paid as somewhat high, given the limited synergy potential; management expects $50 million in run-rate savings by the third year after the expected fiscal mid-2019 close. The deal does not alter our view that Tyson doesn't benefit from a sustainable competitive edge, nor should it lead us to change our Standard stewardship rating.
|Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.|
Zain Akbari does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.