CBS Declares War on Shari Redstone
We're maintaining our moat ratings and fair value estimates on both CBS and Viacom.
CBS (CBS) and the special committee of its board filed a lawsuit on May 14 against National Amusements, accusing it of breaching its fiduciary duty. The lawsuit also seeks to prevent National Amusements, CBS' controlling shareholder, from stopping the special meeting of the board during which the directors will vote on a proposal to issue a dividend of Class A shares to all holders of the Class A and Class B shares. This move would effectively dilute the voting rights of National Amusements from 79% to 17%, in line with its economic interest. The lawsuit and attempt to dilute the voting rights of National Amusements are direct results of the ongoing battle between CBS CEO Les Moonves and National Amusements controlling shareholder Shari Redstone about the merger of CBS and Viacom and the terms of the reunion of the two media firms controlled by the Redstone family. National Amusements issued a statement that refuted the CBS version of the events and said it intends to fight any attempt to dilute its voting power, setting up a potentially long court battle. We are maintaining our narrow moat ratings for both firms and our fair value estimates of $71 for CBS and $35 for Viacom.
CBS is specifically accusing National Amusements of breaching its fiduciary duty due to the actions of Shari Redstone. The lawsuit alleges that Redstone "improperly interjected herself into negotiations" and "acted to undermine CBS's highly lauded and successful management team in a series of escalating attacks." The board also claims that Redstone told a potential buyer to not make an offer for CBS and did so without the approval of the board. News reports have speculated that Redstone would attempt to stack the board at CBS with independent directors aligned with her views if the merger did not occur. Recent board appointee Richard Parsons, the former CEO of Time Warner, was the third independent director elected in the past year who is viewed as being an ally of Redstone.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Neil Macker does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.