Policy Changes Won't Dent Midstream Moats
We may modestly decrease our fair value estimates after proposed policy changes, but we think the market is overly punishing high-quality midstream energy firms.
A D.C. Circuit Court decision prompted the Federal Energy Regulation Commission, or FERC, to propose policy changes on Thursday that could have a negative impact on our midstream coverage. The policy changes could eliminate MLPs' ability to recover a tax allowance, potentially leading to lower tariffs, revenue, and earnings.
We are reviewing Williams Partners (WPZ), Enbridge (ENB), Enbridge Energy Partners LP (EEP), Energy Transfer (ETE), and Spectra Energy Partners (SEP) for potential modest fair value estimate cuts. The relative winners here are corporations and market-based pipelines, primarily NGLs and refined products partnerships where the agreements are negotiated between child and parent. However, we don’t plan any moat changes for the industry. We reiterate that investors should be purchasing the highest-quality midstream firms that are deeply undervalued, including Enterprise Product Partners, Spectra Energy Partners, Enbridge, and Plains All American Pipelines and its general partner.
For natural gas pipelines that charge cost-of-service rates at maximum allowed levels, we expect a drop in EBITDA approximating 1%-5%. We expect a similar potential impact for oil pipelines operating under an index rate methodology. However, with the exception of Williams Partners, we believe many pipelines are actually underearning their allowed rates, meaning there will not be a material impact. Many pipelines charge negotiated or settled rates that also would not be impacted.
Despite the elimination of the double-recovery benefit, the MLP model remains sound, as taxes are still passed through to unitholders. FERC’s action merely eliminates a loophole that allowed MLPs to benefit twice from taxes. This has been debated in FERC filings and court cases going back more than a decade. Given the considerable number of pipelines that appear to be underearning their allowed rates, we think pipeline owners might already have anticipated FERC's move.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Stephen Ellis does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.