Tax Impact on Pipelines Likely Overblown
We would be looking to purchase quality midstream firms at a discount.
A Feb. 8 Wall Street Journal article suggested that all regulated pipelines would be negatively affected by lower tax rates, as regulators would force pipeline operators to cut rates and pass the savings on to customers. We think fears over the issues raised in the article are generally overstated, and we would be looking to purchase quality midstream firms at a discount, including Enbridge, Spectra Energy Partners, Enterprise Products Partners, and Plains All American Pipeline. We do not plan to adjust our fair value estimates or moat ratings for the industry.
The issue at hand is that for pipelines operating under a cost-of-service pricing model, rates are tied to operational costs, which include taxes. With lower tax rates, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has asked 13 pipeline operators to review their rates. We think it is important to understand that the cost-of-service pricing model is not the dominant rate model, as FERC also allows market-based or negotiated rate setting, as well as index-based rate setting. The latter two approaches are the most common rate-setting models in the industry and would not be affected by changes in tax rates. For example, Enterprise Products Partners has most of its pipelines on market-based rates. Further, FERC only regulated interstate pipelines, meaning intrastate assets, including Energy Transfer Partners’ large Texas system, would not be affected. Energy Transfer has been able to negotiate rates for its Texas assets without regulatory hearings. Other pipeline operators such as Spectra Energy Partners have not filed a rate case in more than a decade, and unless they do so, they are unlikely to be affected.
Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.