International-Stock Funds Conquer Concerns in 2016
Most categories managed to climb a wall of worry as emerging markets and energy revived.
This year was a mirror image of 2015 for non-U.S. stock funds in terms of performance, according to preliminary returns. The average international-equity fund lost 3.4% in 2015 but eked out a 4.0% gain in 2016 through Dec. 29, despite a host of concerns. Those worries included terrorism, political turmoil in both the Western and Eastern hemispheres, and currency volatility.
Wall of Worry
Broadly, a rebound in Latin American markets, the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union in June, the surprise election of Donald Trump as the U.S. president, scattered acts of terrorism across the globe, and the strengthening dollar were all among the bricks in the wall of worry that most international-equity Morningstar Categories managed to climb in 2016.
Dan Culloton has a position in the following securities mentioned above: DODFX. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.