Utilities: Bloody February Brings Valuations Back In Line
We don't see an end to this atypical volatility until interest rates rise back toward historical norms.
We don't see an end to this atypical volatility until interest rates rise back toward historical norms.
Getting a handle on utilities the past few years has been as hard for investors as predicting when the Federal Reserve will blink. Utilities were the best-performing sector in 2011, the worst-performing sector in 2012-13, and the best performing sector in 2014. The first part of 2015 is proving just as erratic with utilities trouncing every sector in January before falling 10% in February, the sector's worst stretch apart from the 2008, 2001, and 1974 market crashes. We don't see an end to this atypical volatility until interest rates rise back toward historical norms.
After more than a year of waiting for the utilities bubble to burst, February was the needle that opened some attractive investment opportunities in the sector. In late January, the median U.S. utilities valuation hit the highest level ever since Morningstar began covering utilities. The February swoon cut that premium in half. We also cut our cost of capital assumption in our discounted cash flow valuations to reflect historical inflation and real interest rates, bringing valuation premiums down another 10%. As of mid-March, utilities' median valuation was only slightly above market prices and in line with valuations in late 2013 before the 27% run in 2014.
- source: Morningstar Data
U.S. utilities' fundamentals remain strong. We're forecasting median 5% dividend growth for the group during the next three years, with some utilities such as Edison International , ITC Holdings , NextEra , and Dominion Resources , well above that. Infrastructure replacement and efforts to maximize the value of low-cost natural gas supplies support this growth. A sharp uptick in interest rates could stall some of that growth as financing becomes dearer, but many of these projects have government support and the growth trajectory is quite transparent.
European utilities continue trying to find ways to manage through persistently weak power markets and tough government oversight. E.On (EOAN) has gone so far as to announce plans to spin off its competitive generation assets by 2016. Fellow German utility RWE (RWE) closed its sale of its upstream energy unit, RWE Dea, for EUR 5.1 billion despite objections from the U.K. government. E.ON, RWE, and fellow European diversified utility GDF Suez (GSZ) continue to be the most leveraged to an economic rebound but also most exposed to near-term energy market weakness that will keep dividends flat for the foreseeable future.
Among European diversified utilities, we think EDF offers the best combination of valuation, yield, and dividend stability, with modest growth during the next three to five years for patient investors in the downtrodden space. Other diversifieds have more upside to power prices and similar competitive advantages, but none has EDF's cash flow consistency and near-term visibility to support a narrow economic moat and a strong dividend with a 5.1% current yield. EDF stands far above peers in upside potential from new European capacity markets, as the inaugural U.K. capacity auction clearly demonstrated. EDF also could realize significant incremental value from newbuild nuclear in the United Kingdom.
Top Utilities Sector Picks | |||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Star Rating | Fair Value Estimate | Economic Moat | Fair Value Uncertainty | Consider Buying |
![]() | |||||
RWE | ![]() | EUR 41.00 | Narrow | Medium | EUR 28.70 |
![]() | |||||
Electricite de France | ![]() | EUR 28.00 | Narrow | Medium | EUR 19.60 |
![]() | |||||
Calpine | ![]() | $26.00 | None | High | $15.60 |
![]() | |||||
Data as of 3-26-2015 |
RWE AG (RWE)
RWE is one of Europe's five largest utilities, with vertically integrated generation, transmission, and distribution operations serving 16 million electric customers and 8 million gas customers. It also owns and operates power generation and supply in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, and renewable energy assets in Europe and North Africa. About half of its profits are earned in Germany. RWE's low-cost power generation assets are difficult to replicate and earn high returns when costs rise for alternative power generation sources; however, the surge of renewable generation and nuclear phaseout in Germany have crushed profitability for its fossil-fuel generation. That said, we think RWE can sustain its EUR 1 per share dividend for the foreseeable future while retaining upside to an improving European economy.
Electricité de France (EDF)
EDF is one of the world's largest energy companies, controlling the French transmission and distribution grid along with other pieces of the European grid and a massive global generation fleet. Its French nuclear fleet comprises 58 plants. It also operates the largest unregulated supply business in France, which acts as a broker between generators and retail end users, and holds stakes in numerous other energy-related businesses throughout the world. EDF spans the globe, but France and renewable energy investments will drive growth through 2018. EDF's investments and French electricity market reforms could drive 3% annual EBITDA growth through 2018, supporting dividend growth. EDF's concentrated exposure to French electricity regulation makes it less attractive than more-diversified European utilities if power markets improve, but provides a stronger backbone for cash flows.
Calpine
Calpine is an independent power producer with 25.4 gigawatts of generation capacity throughout the United States and Canada, assuming it closes its sale of six power plants in the Southeast. The company operates in three regions: West (7.5 GW), Texas (9.4 GW), and East (9.6 GW). Its fleet is 97% natural gas generation. The rest of its portfolio comprises 725 MW of California Geyser geothermal plants and 4 MW of solar generation. Calpine's natural gas fleet is one of the most efficient and lowest-cost in the United States. We think this cost advantage positions Calpine well regardless of how natural gas prices move. Although the company would face reduced output if natural gas prices rose, its efficient fleet would still capture significant margin from higher power prices. In addition, Calpine's fleet is well-positioned in regions where electricity supply/demand conditions are tightening.
More Quarter-End Insights
Travis Miller does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.