Skip to Content

Strong Dollar Weighs on P&G, But Wide Moat Intact

We’re lowering our fair value estimate for Procter & Gamble due to the negative impact of currencies, but the firm’s underlying business is gaining traction and shares look modestly undervalued.

Mentioned: ,

While  Procter & Gamble’s (PG) headline second-quarter results were bleak (with sales down 4% and earnings before tax off 8%), we haven’t swayed from our view that the firm’s underlying business is gaining traction. As such, P&G’s wide moat, which stems from its expansive scale and brand power, is firmly in place. However, in light of the negative impact foreign currency is having on current-year results, we’re taking our fair value estimate down to $90 per share, from $94. We now expect sales to slip 3.7% this year (which compares with 1.7% growth previously), and operating margins to approximate 19.4% (versus 20.1% previously). The profit impact is more pronounced, as the firm isn't manufacturing in the locations it is selling, a challenge that is unlikely to abate, but is not indicative of the firm’s fundamentals. Shares are off around 3%, and at a slightly larger discount, we’d contend that the stock would be an attractive investment in a sector where discounts are few and far between.

Excluding foreign currency rates and one-time charges (including a $0.26 per share impairment related to its battery business), sales ticked up 2%, driven by higher prices and favorable product and geographic mix, and operating margins contracted 60 basis points to 20.2%. We still believe efforts to bring new products to market that prove valuable to consumers are paying off. In fact,  Kimberly-Clark (KMB) recently noted that it suffered share losses at the hand of P&G in both U.S. diapers and adult incontinence. This commentary runs in line with P&G’s disclosure at its investor conference in November 2014 that Pampers (P&G’s largest brand, with $10 billion in annual sales) had overtaken Huggies and now controls around 38% share of the U.S. diaper market, about 300 basis points above the level held by Kimberly.

Erin Lash does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.

Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.

We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.

We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.

How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:

  • Verify your identity, personalize the content you receive, or create and administer your account.
  • Provide specific products and services to you, such as portfolio management or data aggregation.
  • Develop and improve features of our offerings.
  • Gear advertisements and other marketing efforts towards your interests.

To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.

Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.

To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.

Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.