Supply Chains Snap Under Pressure
Despite the massive disruption, we still see opportunities across some affected sectors.
Despite the massive disruption, we still see opportunities across some affected sectors.
When looking at the current shipping crisis, it’s important to know the background. Since 2015, new vessel orders in freight shipping had fallen markedly, dropping by roughly half from the first half of the last decade. This tight capacity kindled the fire we are now witnessing, with shipping demand far outstripping supply and freight rates rocketing. The match that started the fire, however, was the coronavirus pandemic, coming hot on the heels of the already disruptive U.S.-China trade war.
Semiconductor manufacturers are now running at full capacity and padding their order books for 2022, focusing only on the highest-value clients. Auto manufacturers are depleting their inventories as they wait for the requisite semiconductors to complete their production cycles. Fashion companies are still coming to grips with delayed delivery times and an increased focus on online shopping. And global shipping and logistic companies are taking full advantage of the tight capacity in freight to draw in high-value clients and beefy margins.
The market consensus forecasts normal ocean freight rates in 2022, falling almost 20% from this year’s elevated levels, with the end of 2021 commonly identified as an inflection point. While we agree with the premise here, we believe the risk is to the downside, with the likely impact of these fixes not necessarily having the desired effect until early or mid-2022; this means elevated freight rates could persist for a while longer.
The stock market as a whole has rallied hard over the last 18 months, and a quick comparison between the valuations of those stocks that were worst affected by supply chain issues and those that were not suggests the market believes the worst of the shipping crisis is over and freight rates--as well as many of the supply chain issues--should ease soon. The market is half-right.
The picture is looking brighter because delays at ports are being reduced, schedule reliability is improving, and the successful rollout of vaccination programs across the United States and Europe will soon mean further removals of pandemic-related restrictions. A pause by carriers on scrapping vessels and the addition of 5.40 million new shipping containers this year alone should also help abate elevated freight rates and ultimately get goods moving more quickly and reliably through the supply chain. However, we believe a year-end target for this is probably too optimistic. It could be sometime in the first or second quarter of 2022 before we see meaningful improvement.
This does not solve all the supply chain issues that have surfaced during the pandemic, many of which are more structural in nature. However, the pandemic should be a catalyst for change, with companies already working with shipping and logistic partners to diversify their supply chains in order to bolster against future disruptions. It may also encourage a longer-term outlook, with companies now transitioning to long-term agreements with carriers to lock in capacity and rates, all of which should help avoid a repeat of the mass disruption caused by the pandemic.
In some of the sectors we have analyzed, we see little value. This is particularly true for the shipping and logistics segment, with companies like DSV (DSV) and Kuehne + Nagle (KNIN) firmly in overvalued territory. In other areas, many of our picks are focused on stocks with pre-existing overhangs, like Hanesbrands (HBI) in fashion or Intel (INTC) in semiconductors, where we see a mismatch in the strength of the underlying business and lackluster market expectations for both stocks. In the auto segment, we see more stock ideas, with Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) in the U.S. and Volkswagen (VWAGY)/(VWAPY)/(VOW)/(VOW3) and BMW (BMWYY)/(BMW) in Europe. As semiconductor supply issues abate, we believe smart market positioning in the electric vehicle segment will underpin these carmakers’ ability to succeed.
This information was published Sept. 30 as part of a larger report that is available to Morningstar’s institutional clients. Morningstar Direct and Office users can find the report here, while PitchBook users can find it here.
Michael Field does not own (actual or beneficial) shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.