The Best Target-Date Funds for 2021 and Beyond
Pimco joins our list of top target-date funds, and T. Rowe Price gets an upgrade.
The coronavirus pandemic has presented the biggest challenge for target-date strategies since the financial crisis of 2008. These strategies' performance rebounded sharply from the first-quarter bear market, but the fallout from the economic shock continued to weigh on investor contributions throughout the year.
As of February 2021, target-date mutual funds held a record $1.6 trillion in assets, up from $1.1 trillion at the bottom of the 2020 coronavirus-driven bear market, and more than double the $740 billion they held five years ago. The record assets are mostly the result of market appreciation, as flows into target-date mutual funds slowed considerably in 2020.
We cover this slowdown in flows and other trends shaping target-date strategies in the recently published 2021 Target-Date Strategy Landscape. Morningstar Direct and Office clients can download the full report here.
Here, we'll take a closer look at our Morningstar Analyst Ratings for target-date mutual funds and highlight our top-rated series.
In November 2019, we enhanced the methodology that underpins our qualitative, forward-looking Morningstar Analyst Rating. The updated methodology applies to equity, fixed-income, and multi-asset strategies and should improve our ratings' effectiveness and usefulness to investors. More information can be found here, but the high level changes are:
The table below shows ratings assigned to the cheapest share class of the target-date fund series we cover, as of March 2021, along with the prospectus-adjusted expense ratio. It also highlights how the Analyst Rating, People Pillar, Process Pillar, and Parent Pillar changed between March 2020 and March 2021.
Overall, as you can see, three series' cheapest share classes were upgraded owing to higher conviction.
Only one series, TIAA-CREF Lifecycle, was downgraded, and this was due to our updated methodology. Our conviction in the series' management team and process hasn't changed, but under the new methodology it is tougher to earn our highest Analyst Rating given the low dispersion of returns among target-date funds and higher degrees of confidence in the teams and approaches at other series.
Series that newly qualify for a Morningstar Analyst Rating of Gold include:
Our analysis included two target-date series that retained their Analyst Ratings of Gold, although both saw significant manager changes: BlackRock LifePath Index and JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend.
In December 2020, BlackRock announced that Matt O'Hara, co-head of its LifePath suite of target dates, had left the firm. O'Hara was a key figure in keeping BlackRock's target-date funds ahead of the curve. In 2014, he led the research that drove a revamping of the LifePath glide path. While O'Hara's departure is a loss, the remaining team has lost none of its intensive focus on research that will continue to improve the series. Chris Chung, head of asset allocation on the team since 2018 and a team member since 2008, replaced O'Hara as lead manager on BlackRock LifePath Index, and the firm further bolstered the team's resources by naming Partha Mamidipudi head of human capital research. He led research for the team until 2016 and rejoined from his role building customized portfolio-optimization tools for advisors on Aladdin. We remain confident in the team's capabilities.
At J.P. Morgan, Anne Lester stepped down as a portfolio manager for the JPMorgan SmartRetirement and JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend series in April 2020, in anticipation of a move to focusing on national retirement policy. Lester had overseen this series as lead manager since its inception in 2006, and though she relinquished day-to-day responsibilities on the series in early 2019, Lester continued to influence the strategic direction of J.P. Morgan's target-date series. Lester pioneered innovative retirement plan participant research that meaningfully enhanced the series and raised the bar for target-date managers in general. Naturally, her departure was a loss for this series.
Encouragingly, Lester's longtime comanager and 20-year J.P. Morgan veteran Dan Oldroyd stepped up as this series' leader. Oldroyd's long history with the team and the series inspires confidence despite the abruptness of Lester's announcement. However, Oldroyd's research and portfolio-implementation responsibilities had already increased meaningfully in the wake of a previous portfolio manager shakeup in 2019. Now Oldroyd has taken on Lester's participant research duties, too, and must marshal the vast multi-asset resources that support the series. With Oldroyd alone at the helm, we downgraded the SmartRetirement and SmartRetirement Blend series' People Pillar to Above Average from High, but SmartRetirement Blend retained its Gold rating because of its low fees. SmartRetirement was downgraded to Silver.
Jason Kephart does not own shares in any of the securities mentioned above. Find out about Morningstar’s editorial policies.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.