3 Momentous Events Highlight the Impact of Investing in 2020
The pandemic, the fight for racial justice, and the presidential election demonstrate the importance of weighing in with capital to create positive societal change.
The year began innocently enough with the growing debate over corporate purpose. Should corporations continue to view their purpose primarily in terms of maximizing shareholder value, or should they view purpose in broader terms, recognizing their obligations to other stakeholders and society?
Then two unforeseen events, the global pandemic and the murder of George Floyd, underscored the importance of the stakeholder-capitalism model, which focuses on creating sustainable long-term value that serves all stakeholders and creates positive societal impacts. This, more than anything, is the ultimate purpose of sustainable investing: to weigh in with investment capital in support of the stakeholder model.
The Pandemic: Companies That Prioritized Stakeholders Were More Resilient
Given the gravity of the pandemic, companies had no choice but to prioritize their stakeholders. The effects of corporate responses to the pandemic on workers, customers, and communities were closely scrutinized in media and by organizations like JUST Capital, which created the COVID-19 Corporate Response Tracker. JUST Capital found that firms it assessed as doing the best jobs prioritizing workers had more resilient stock returns than those doing the worst. Researchers at Harvard found that firms generating positive public sentiment about the way they responded to the pandemic and their effects on employees, suppliers, and broader society outperformed their counterparts during the market collapse in the first quarter.
This focus on corporate responses to the pandemic created greater awareness among investors for the importance of the "social" dimension of environmental, social, and governance analysis. Most professional ESG analysis emphasizes these areas, particularly in industries and for companies where they are most material to financial performance, but many end investors have had the impression that sustainable investing is mostly about the "environmental" dimension of ESG, especially climate change.
Sustainable equity funds, in general, proved themselves to be resilient in a down market, something many of them hadn't had an opportunity to demonstrate prior to the pandemic. This is important not so much because the actual returns of sustainable funds were massively different from those of conventional funds--they weren't--but because the outperformance of sustainable equity funds appeared to be attributable as much to their emphasis on companies with stronger ESG credentials as they were to their sector weightings. While energy underweights helped during the first quarter, ESG stock selection has been the biggest positive factor throughout the year, especially outside the United States.
Racial Justice: Investors Have a Role to Play in Fighting Systemic Racism
The events of the summer highlighted the urgent need to address systemic racism in the U.S. Indeed, as Calvert Research and Management CEO John Streur wrote in June, "Ending racism is a responsibility of corporations, and corporations must recognize that their current effects to promote their core values, and diversity and inclusion programs, fall far short of what is needed today."
Through engagement and proxy voting, sustainable investors can push for change at the corporations they hold in their portfolios. Sustainable investors press companies on their diversity and inclusion policies, on the composition of their boards, on the way they compensate employees--particularly lower-wage workers whom we are more fully recognizing as essential during the pandemic, on labor relations generally, and on where corporate lobbying and political expenditures go.
Over the next year, you can bet that sustainable investors will closely question what corporations are doing to fight systemic racism. BlackRock, for example, announced last week that it will ask U.S. companies to disclose EEO-1 data on workforce race, gender, and ethnicity. This information is required by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but companies are not required to make it public.
Investors can have a significant impact on corporate leadership, especially when investors are aligned with other stakeholders and the public. Lending the weight of your investments to the cause of greater corporate responsibility and stakeholder capitalism is one important tool for change you have at your disposal.
As I wrote in June, investors have the means to drive change. An all-out attack on systemic racism requires every tool in the box.
The U.S. Election: A More Positive Environment for Sustainable Investing
First, President-elect Joe Biden's approach to climate change will realign the U.S. with the Paris Agreement and the rest of the world. As a result, the transition to a low-carbon global economy, for which sustainable investors are generally well-positioned, will gain momentum.
Second, Biden appointees to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Labor Department will be knowledgeable about and supportive of sustainable investing, replacing those from the Trump administration who clearly had an ax to grind against it. Biden also has appointed Brian Deese, BlackRock's global head of sustainable investing, to run the National Economic Council. While Deese was chosen for his economic and climate policy work in the Obama administration, he brings a deep understanding of sustainable investing to the center of economic policymaking in the new administration.
Finally, in terms of specific policies, we will likely see moves by the SEC and Labor Department to roll back Trump administration rules limiting the use of ESG funds in retirement plans and limiting the ability of ESG investors to participate in the shareholder resolution and proxy voting process. In addition, we expect the SEC to move to require public companies to disclose climate-related financial risks and greenhouse gas emissions in their operations and supply chains.
Even without regulatory support in the U.S., sustainable investing has grown significantly over the past four years. By the end of the year, I expect 2020 flows into sustainable open-end and exchange-traded funds to flirt with the $50 billion mark. That's 10 times more flows into sustainable funds in the U.S. than in 2018 (last year, flows were just more than $20 billion). And US SIF: The Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment estimates that 1 in 3 dollars of overall assets under management in the U.S. now use some form of sustainable investment strategy. The events of 2020 have further demonstrated the salience of ESG to investment managers and strengthened the rationale for end investors to invest in a sustainable way.
Jon Hale (firstname.lastname@example.org) has been researching the fund industry since 1995. He is Morningstar's director of ESG research for the Americas and a member of Morningstar's investment research department. While Morningstar typically agrees with the views Jon expresses on ESG matters, they represent his own views.
Transparency is how we protect the integrity of our work and keep empowering investors to achieve their goals and dreams. And we have unwavering standards for how we keep that integrity intact, from our research and data to our policies on content and your personal data.
We’d like to share more about how we work and what drives our day-to-day business.
We sell different types of products and services to both investment professionals and individual investors. These products and services are usually sold through license agreements or subscriptions. Our investment management business generates asset-based fees, which are calculated as a percentage of assets under management. We also sell both admissions and sponsorship packages for our investment conferences and advertising on our websites and newsletters.
How we use your information depends on the product and service that you use and your relationship with us. We may use it to:
To learn more about how we handle and protect your data, visit our privacy center.
Maintaining independence and editorial freedom is essential to our mission of empowering investor success. We provide a platform for our authors to report on investments fairly, accurately, and from the investor’s point of view. We also respect individual opinions––they represent the unvarnished thinking of our people and exacting analysis of our research processes. Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive.
To further protect the integrity of our editorial content, we keep a strict separation between our sales teams and authors to remove any pressure or influence on our analyses and research.
Read our editorial policy to learn more about our process.